(Moved to

Al-Qaeda and Western Intelligence Operations

by Rahnuma Ahmed

Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies…. Al-Qaida, literally “the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.

Robin Cook, British foreign minister, 1997-2001
(in saying this, he was divulging confidential information.
Cook died a month later, in August 2005).

That al-Qaeda originated in the US-financed mujahideen guerilla war in Afghanistan, that Osama bin Laden enjoyed American support and received CIA training in `weapons, sabotage and bomb-making,’ is well-known. That Laden later fell out with the US administration over the entry of US forces into Saudi Arabia (the presence of foreign forces in the “land of the two mosques”) after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1991, is also well-known as is known that the resulting enmity led to al-Qaeda’s attacks on 9/11 in the US (for instance).

But this story line — once-allies-now-enemies-unto-death — seems untenable in the light of recent research conducted by British political scientist and policy analyst Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation and the Anatomy of Terrorism (2005) . A Norwegian daily, more-recently, has published an article based on his research (Kristin Aalen, Terrorists Working for Western CountriesStavanger Aftenbladet, 24.11.08 ). It is accompanied by a geo-political world map — largely true to his findings except for over-simplifiying the Pentagon’s sponsorship of al-Qaeda fighters in the Balkans — which outlines how these two forces have worked together. The Norwegian text has been substituted by its English translation, available on Nafeez’s blog. Without going into the details of what is shown on the map, I want to write instead about what he says of al-Qaeda (`Terrorism and Statecraft: Al-Qaeda and Western Covert Operations after the Cold War,’ in Paul Zarembka ed. The Hidden History of 9-11).

Click here to download PDF


Click on map above to enlarge

Click on map to enlarge or on hyperlink above map to download PDF.



A vehicle of Western covert operations

Al-Qaeda is a monolithic, hierarchical organisation. Its activities are coordinated by its leader, Osama bin Laden. It is the source of contemporary international terrorism. These conventional protrayals, writes Nafeez, are false. The truth is, that al-Qaeda — a term coined not by Islamists but by the CIA — refers to the computer database that Robin Cook had pointed out. Of course, Nafeez adds, this does not mean that it is not `some sort of identifiable entity.’ It does exist, but not as `a self-directed institution in its own right,’ rather, as an amorphous association of networks.

Factually-speaking, al-Qaeda is `a post-Cold war strategic instrument.’ Although born within the realities of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, in the CIA’s vision, its operational scope was not to be restricted to Afghanistan only. According to a CIA analyst interviewed by Richard Labeviere, chief editor at Radio France International, “The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them against our adversaries worked marvellously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese influence in Central Asia.”

According to Nafeez, al-Qaeda’s activities, during and after the Cold War, related primarily to a new doctrine of covert destabilisation, one that was, and is, being implemented in `new theatres of operation strategically close to Russian and Chinese influence,’ i.e., eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, and central Asia. As such, al-Qaeda is better characterised as a `conglomerate of quasi-independent Islamic terrorist cells,’ one that spans at least 26 countries.

This conglomerate is inextricably embedded — both with regard to its raison d’etre, and its modus operandi — in another conglomerate, a `disturbing’ one, says Nafeez, of international Western diplomatic, financial, military and intelligence policies. The geo-strategic structure of al-Qaeda derives directly from western corporate interests, those particularly related to monopolising global energy resources. In all mujahideen activity, one consistently comes across the directed involvement of Western financial, military and intelligence power. This takes place through state-regional nodes in strategic regions (prime examples are Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Algeria), direct liaisons, and human nodes. US, British and Western power `routinely manipulate al-Qaeda’; in all cases, including 9-11, it generates destabilisation. This `paves the way for, and ultimately sustains the involvement of, Anglo-American interests in the monopolization of regional resources and the establishment of military-backed geopolitical power.’ Thus, al-Qaeda is not, as popular perception goes, `a foreign enemy external to Western civilization’. Rather, it is the name for `a highly developed category of Western covert operations,’ one that is designed to secure destabilization through the creation, multiplication, mobilization, and manipulation of disparate mujahideen groups.

Epilogue: Debates are currently raging in Bangladesh over the necessity of cracking down against militancy, the lack of a clear government policy, the likelihood that Islamist militant groups are regrouping for attacks, that madrasas are breeding grounds for extremists, militant attacks are aimed at destablising the government, and the need for regional anti-terror initiatives.

Are these debates, and policy proposals, totally un-connected to the policy of `guiding the evolution of Islam’ in what is now considered by some to be a new sphere of US strategic interest? Are these un-connected to the US Embassy’s growing concern to promote `respect for American values’ in Bangladesh? (see Sumit Ganguly, The Rise of Islamist Militancy in Bangladesh, report commissioned by the United States Institute of Peace, 2006 ). Those taking part in the debate, either deliberately or foolishly, feign ignorance.

Published in New Age, 27 April 2009

May 1, 2009 - Posted by | Global Issues, Uncategorized


  1. very good post, thank you.

    Comment by cool tools | June 23, 2009 | Reply

  2. মি. শহিদুল,
    কুড়িগ্রামের উকিল ও বাসভ্রমণে আপনার যে অভিজ্ঞতা হয়েছে, তার জন্য আমি কুড়িগ্রামবাসীর পক্ষ থেকে ক্ষমা প্রার্থনা করছি। আমি আন্তরিকভাবে দু:খিত ও লজ্জিত।

    Comment by kurigram | August 5, 2009 | Reply

  3. Thanks for posting this valuable article

    Comment by Akku | September 5, 2009 | Reply

  4. “Hi:

    Two things

    1) I’d like your permission to (re)print your article on Frontline
    for our website

    2) I was hoping we could use your ‘scribing’ talent for our website.

    The Best Shows Youre Not Watching (dot) com [all one word]

    ‘The Clone Wars’ is one of our featured shows. We’re hoping to round up a few people who can occasionally contribute perspective (via an article/blog) on the shows – maybe a recent episode, future direction, plot shortcomings etc.

    What’s in it for you?
    Primarily a larger audience back channeled to your blog. We don’t pay but the site has a lot of promise and we’re pretty excited about getting it off the ground. Let me know what you think.


    Comment by (Best Show)Watch | September 7, 2009 | Reply

  5. I felt scared while reading your writing .I’m a father of a daughter & another baby will see the light next year if everything is OK .But where I’m leaving them … ? !

    Are we the genie pig of these giant vandalistic states & its allies ?

    Please write how we can keep ourselves alive & living a normal life .

    Comment by chandan | September 27, 2009 | Reply

  6. Very good article. Thank you and if you write some new plese write at

    Comment by Anita | September 30, 2009 | Reply

  7. Why Saudi Arabia coordinately waged a full-scale war in Yemen against Al-Qaeda? I hope you might have some juicy conspiracy theory available to you working behind that! After all you are deep into it. Well, you have already digested the idea that al-Qaeda is nothing but a file name in CIA record—the omnipotent actor. The only worshiping object of your bullshit intellectualism. So, i’m waiting to hear from u…

    Comment by Muhd. Junayed | December 27, 2009 | Reply

  8. When I conducted painstaking research on an important issue where mainstream media had provided surprisingly scant analysis, I was not looking for agreement. But I did expect cogent arguments and well reasoned inference. Perhaps, even counter-evidence. Flippant dismissive responses that fail to engage with either the logic of the process or the rigour of the investigation carried out by researchers as highly regarded as Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, not only adds nothing to the debate, but rather insults the intelligence of the readers, who surely have greater analytical skills.

    Comment by rahnuma | December 28, 2009 | Reply

  9. Well this is a concept, so no one should expect all the details to be there. And only 1st year work?

    Comment by world news | April 12, 2010 | Reply

  10. Nice and informative sharing.

    Comment by Panama lawyer | December 21, 2011 | Reply

  11. This is used to check if the profit and income is directly proportional to the investments placed by the businesses. The income and profit should increase if the amount of feeds provided to the rabbits is doubled.

    Comment by how to take professional pictures | February 11, 2012 | Reply

  12. thanks for the great post even though i can read the language- Advice

    Comment by David Caruso (@DavidCaruso11) | December 19, 2012 | Reply

  13. Thanks For shearing information.But i also hate this department.

    Comment by Tangail cotton Saree | December 22, 2016 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: